Sign inTry it

Benchmark: compare electricity on CHECK24 with an AI agent

On CHECK24, Wield's recipe passed 9 of 9 electricity comparisons with a median of 1.5 seconds and no model cost per run. A browser agent running Claude Sonnet 5.5 passed 5 of 5 runs, with a median of 103 seconds and $0.26 per run. The recipe needs two requests per comparison, and neither side was blocked by the site.

Updated

Live recipecheck24.de/compare-electricityv1

CHECK24 Compare electricity tariffs for a postcode and yearly consumption

Read-only, no loginRuns in your browser only

Parameters (7)
citystringOnly needed when a postcode covers several places; otherwise looked up
consumption_kwhintegerrequiredYearly consumption in kWh, e.g. 2500 (2 people)
exclude_dynamicbooleanDrop dynamic/flex tariffs whose price follows the exchange price
green_onlybooleanOnly 100 % renewable (Ökostrom) tariffs
limitinteger 5 | 10 | 25
sortstringprice = CHECK24's price ranking (year-1 price incl. bonuses); popularity = CHECK24's default "price" | "popularity"
zip_codestringrequiredGerman postcode, e.g. '10178'
Use it with your agent
Measured on the live site67× faster
MetricWield recipeBrowser Use + Claude Sonnet 5.5
Success100%100%
Median time1.5 s103 s
Cost per run$0$0.263

9 runs each, 7 November 2026. How we measure

The task

Both sides ran the same three comparisons. Each one sets a postcode and an annual consumption.

QueryPostcodeConsumption
q1101782,500 kWh
q2803313,500 kWh
q3506671,500 kWh

Pass check: at least five tariffs, each with a provider, a tariff name and a monthly price.

Results (7 Nov 2026)

Wield recipeBrowser agent
Runs passing the check9 of 95 of 5
Median time per run1.5 s103.4 s
Model cost per run$0$0.26
Requests per run (median)2470 (30 to the site)
Blocked by the site0 runs0 of 5 runs

The browser agent took a median of 13 steps, 95,446 input tokens and 2,860 output tokens per run. Its log records no HTTP 401, 403 or 429 response from the site. Wield had no failed runs. Its fastest run took 1,274 ms and its slowest 6,393 ms.

Why the results differ

The recipe makes two requests per comparison. Each call creates a calculation on CHECK24's server, so the recipe never sets overwrite=true. The result also includes an annual cost without bonuses, because CHECK24 shows prices on mixed bases.

The browser agent fills in the form, waits for results and reads them page by page. Its median of 13 steps means 13 model calls per run. That is where most of its time goes.

Caveats

  • Small and preliminary. The benchmark was still running on 7 Nov 2026. Pacing at about 30 site requests per hour keeps counts low on some sides.
  • Prices change. The tariffs in these runs are a snapshot from 7 Nov 2026.
  • Cost is model cost only. Wield's $0 covers model cost. No model runs in the loop when a recipe runs.

Terms of CHECK24

CHECK24's terms prohibit automated data extraction. The recipe runs one comparison at a time that you start, from your browser, with two requests. Switching providers stays on CHECK24 through the results link. Check the site's terms yourself. Wield's recipes note known restrictions.

FAQ

Does CHECK24 block browser agents?

Not in these runs. The browser agent was blocked by the site in 0 of 5 runs, and its log records no 401, 403 or 429 response. Other postcodes and times may differ, and bot protection can change at any time.

How fast is the Wield recipe for comparing electricity on CHECK24?

The median run took 1.5 seconds (1,544 ms) over 9 runs. The fastest took 1,274 ms and the slowest 6,393 ms. All 9 runs passed the check.

Can I rerun this benchmark?

Yes. The method is on the benchmark page, and the query table above is the full input. The raw per-run logs keep destinations, timing, tokens and checks. They do not keep page contents.